<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394401</link>
    <description>Where a refund notification fixes limitation by reference to actual payment of service tax, the later date of the Input Service Distributor invoice cannot replace that statutory starting point for Table II claims under Form A-4. The relevant date remains the payment made by the Input Service Distributor to the service provider, and treating the invoice date as decisive would rewrite the notification. The text also states that any extension of time beyond the prescribed one-year period must be a conscious, reasoned exercise of the limited discretion conferred by the notification; a bare grant of refund does not show that delay was validly condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394401</link>
      <description>Where a refund notification fixes limitation by reference to actual payment of service tax, the later date of the Input Service Distributor invoice cannot replace that statutory starting point for Table II claims under Form A-4. The relevant date remains the payment made by the Input Service Distributor to the service provider, and treating the invoice date as decisive would rewrite the notification. The text also states that any extension of time beyond the prescribed one-year period must be a conscious, reasoned exercise of the limited discretion conferred by the notification; a bare grant of refund does not show that delay was validly condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>