<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394400</link>
    <description>Section 16-D of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was treated as a remedial provision for cases involving inability to participate effectively in assessment proceedings or allegations of statutory illegality or breach of natural justice. The Special Committee&#039;s rejection of the assessee&#039;s application was based on a three-year limitation theory and an alleged failure to cooperate, even though no express limitation was prescribed under Section 16-D and the grievance of ex parte assessment without a real hearing was not properly addressed. The rejection was quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on merits after granting an effective opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394400</link>
      <description>Section 16-D of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was treated as a remedial provision for cases involving inability to participate effectively in assessment proceedings or allegations of statutory illegality or breach of natural justice. The Special Committee&#039;s rejection of the assessee&#039;s application was based on a three-year limitation theory and an alleged failure to cooperate, even though no express limitation was prescribed under Section 16-D and the grievance of ex parte assessment without a real hearing was not properly addressed. The rejection was quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on merits after granting an effective opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>