https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287348 The Board found that the petitioner's allegations of oppression and mismanagement were substantiated, particularly regarding the improper allotment of shares and exclusion from management. However, due to the sale of company assets and discharge of liabilities, relief under Section 402 was deemed impractical. The Board directed future notices to be sent to the petitioner's addresses in Delhi and Bangkok. The petition was disposed of with costs on parties. en-us Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287348 The Board found that the petitioner's allegations of oppression and mismanagement were substantiated, particularly regarding the improper allotment of shares and exclusion from management. However, due to the sale of company assets and discharge of liabilities, relief under Section 402 was deemed impractical. The Board directed future notices to be sent to the petitioner's addresses in Delhi and Bangkok. The petition was disposed of with costs on parties. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287348