<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 300 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2010-11 in part, directing the grant of depreciation on computer software and deductions under section 10A for both Unit I and Unit II in Bangalore. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the same year. The assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed as academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:52:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 300 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2010-11 in part, directing the grant of depreciation on computer software and deductions under section 10A for both Unit I and Unit II in Bangalore. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the same year. The assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed as academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>