<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 294 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the capital gain as Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) and allowing the deduction under Section 54 based on the date of the sale agreement. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on both issues, emphasizing that the right to obtain the flats was acquired long before the sale and that the acquisition of the new asset fell within the permissible period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 294 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the capital gain as Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) and allowing the deduction under Section 54 based on the date of the sale agreement. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on both issues, emphasizing that the right to obtain the flats was acquired long before the sale and that the acquisition of the new asset fell within the permissible period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>