<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 285 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal refused to condone a 2554-day delay in filing the appeal, citing insufficient reasons provided by the assessee. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal action, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting that the law of limitation serves public policy by ensuring prompt pursuit of legal remedies. The decision was rendered on 21/01/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 285 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal refused to condone a 2554-day delay in filing the appeal, citing insufficient reasons provided by the assessee. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal action, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting that the law of limitation serves public policy by ensuring prompt pursuit of legal remedies. The decision was rendered on 21/01/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>