<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (9) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287346</link>
    <description>Arrear municipal rates under Section 167 of the Bengal Municipal Act created a statutory first charge on the holding, and a purchaser at a court sale was not automatically protected where constructive notice or a duty to inquire existed. Even so, the municipality could enforce that statutory charge only through a properly framed suit and an appropriate charge decree; a proceeding under Order 21, Rule 63 CPC could not be used to create or enforce a charge where only a money decree existed. The purchasers therefore took subject to the charge in principle, but the charge could not be declared or enforced in the present proceedings for want of a valid charge suit and decree.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (9) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287346</link>
      <description>Arrear municipal rates under Section 167 of the Bengal Municipal Act created a statutory first charge on the holding, and a purchaser at a court sale was not automatically protected where constructive notice or a duty to inquire existed. Even so, the municipality could enforce that statutory charge only through a properly framed suit and an appropriate charge decree; a proceeding under Order 21, Rule 63 CPC could not be used to create or enforce a charge where only a money decree existed. The purchasers therefore took subject to the charge in principle, but the charge could not be declared or enforced in the present proceedings for want of a valid charge suit and decree.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>