<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Enhanced Value Agreement Not Mis-Declaration; Confiscation and Fines on Importer Overturned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52874</link>
    <description>Valuation of imported goods - import of multi functional digital copiers - enhancement of value - Mere acquiescence by the importer in order to expedite their clearances through customs does not form the evidence that the value has been mis-declared, more so when the enhancement was marginal - Confiscation as well as redemption fine set aside. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:52:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:52:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Enhanced Value Agreement Not Mis-Declaration; Confiscation and Fines on Importer Overturned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52874</link>
      <description>Valuation of imported goods - import of multi functional digital copiers - enhancement of value - Mere acquiescence by the importer in order to expedite their clearances through customs does not form the evidence that the value has been mis-declared, more so when the enhancement was marginal - Confiscation as well as redemption fine set aside. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:52:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>