https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287339 Penalty under Section 15A of the SEBI Act was confined to failure to furnish documents, and could not be sustained on the footing adopted in the impugned order where the record showed that the appellant had already furnished the available materials. On those facts, the provision invoked for non-furnishing was not attracted, and the challenge based on adverse inference and alleged false information did not support the penalty. The impugned order was therefore set aside. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:50:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287339 Penalty under Section 15A of the SEBI Act was confined to failure to furnish documents, and could not be sustained on the footing adopted in the impugned order where the record showed that the appellant had already furnished the available materials. On those facts, the provision invoked for non-furnishing was not attracted, and the challenge based on adverse inference and alleged false information did not support the penalty. The impugned order was therefore set aside. Case-Laws SEBI Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287339