<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 61 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21976</link>
    <description>Rule 115(c) of the Income-tax Rules was examined for whether foreign exchange export receipts had to be converted at the rate prevailing on the last day of the previous year, rather than on the date of actual receipt. The Court held that income tax attaches to income when actually received in the course of business, and that delegated rules under section 295 cannot widen the charging provisions or impose tax on notional income not yet received or realisable. On that basis, rule 115(c), as then framed, was beyond the parent Act and could not be applied to the assessee&#039;s export receipts; the revisional order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 61 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21976</link>
      <description>Rule 115(c) of the Income-tax Rules was examined for whether foreign exchange export receipts had to be converted at the rate prevailing on the last day of the previous year, rather than on the date of actual receipt. The Court held that income tax attaches to income when actually received in the course of business, and that delegated rules under section 295 cannot widen the charging provisions or impose tax on notional income not yet received or realisable. On that basis, rule 115(c), as then framed, was beyond the parent Act and could not be applied to the assessee&#039;s export receipts; the revisional order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>