<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 263 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394356</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remanded specific issues back to the Assessing Officer for further consideration. Adjustments were made to the disallowances under Sections 40A(2) and car expenses. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support claims for exemptions and deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 263 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394356</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remanded specific issues back to the Assessing Officer for further consideration. Adjustments were made to the disallowances under Sections 40A(2) and car expenses. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support claims for exemptions and deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>