<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 259 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that differences in calculating interest income did not justify the penalty and highlighted the discretionary nature of penalty provisions. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unwarranted, aligning with principles from relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 259 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that differences in calculating interest income did not justify the penalty and highlighted the discretionary nature of penalty provisions. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unwarranted, aligning with principles from relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>