https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287319 Title to a composite disputed religious site was examined through evidence of dedication, waqf by user, adverse possession, and lost grant, and the Muslim claim failed for lack of reliable proof and deficient pleadings. The Hindu parties were found to have a better possessory claim on the evidence of continuous worship, historical record, and site materials, while the faith-based claim that the central dome area was the birthplace of Lord Ram was accepted. A three-way partition was rejected as beyond the pleadings, and final relief was moulded through constitutional powers, including vesting the site in a trust for temple construction and allotting alternative land for a mosque. en-us Sat, 09 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:06:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287319 Title to a composite disputed religious site was examined through evidence of dedication, waqf by user, adverse possession, and lost grant, and the Muslim claim failed for lack of reliable proof and deficient pleadings. The Hindu parties were found to have a better possessory claim on the evidence of continuous worship, historical record, and site materials, while the faith-based claim that the central dome area was the birthplace of Lord Ram was accepted. A three-way partition was rejected as beyond the pleadings, and final relief was moulded through constitutional powers, including vesting the site in a trust for temple construction and allotting alternative land for a mosque. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 09 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287319