<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1985 - ITAT, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287311</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271A for failure to report business receipts and maintain books of account. However, the penalty under Section 271B was deleted as it was impossible to audit non-maintained books. Appeals for penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271A were dismissed, while the appeal for the penalty under Section 271B was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 10:45:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1985 - ITAT, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287311</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271A for failure to report business receipts and maintain books of account. However, the penalty under Section 271B was deleted as it was impossible to audit non-maintained books. Appeals for penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271A were dismissed, while the appeal for the penalty under Section 271B was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>