https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287307 The commentary addresses whether the State Government had any statutory power to fix a State Advised Cane Price under the U.P. Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. It notes the earlier Division Bench view that only the Central Government could fix the minimum cane price under Clause 3, and that there was no statutory basis for State-level fixation. It also records that the Supreme Court had passed an interim order noting the absence of such statutory basis. On that reasoning, the State's order dated 12.11.2002 was stayed and the State Government was directed not to fix such price until further orders. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2020 15:39:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287307 The commentary addresses whether the State Government had any statutory power to fix a State Advised Cane Price under the U.P. Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. It notes the earlier Division Bench view that only the Central Government could fix the minimum cane price under Clause 3, and that there was no statutory basis for State-level fixation. It also records that the Supreme Court had passed an interim order noting the absence of such statutory basis. On that reasoning, the State's order dated 12.11.2002 was stayed and the State Government was directed not to fix such price until further orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287307