<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 761 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287306</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the denial of sales tax exemption for bottling LPG, ruling that it did not qualify as &quot;manufacture&quot; for exemption purposes. Temporary eligibility certificates did not confer binding rights, and the principle of promissory estoppel was deemed inapplicable. The petitioners were held liable for sales tax regardless of collection from consumers, emphasizing strict interpretation and establishment of exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 761 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287306</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the denial of sales tax exemption for bottling LPG, ruling that it did not qualify as &quot;manufacture&quot; for exemption purposes. Temporary eligibility certificates did not confer binding rights, and the principle of promissory estoppel was deemed inapplicable. The petitioners were held liable for sales tax regardless of collection from consumers, emphasizing strict interpretation and establishment of exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>