<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1827 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287301</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Financial Creditor&#039;s petition under Section 7 of the IBC due to non-compliance with the Third Supplemental Inter Se Agreement. The Financial Creditor&#039;s failure to provide the mandatory notice to the Lead Bank rendered the petition not maintainable. The tribunal highlighted the importance of honoring contractual obligations and acting in accordance with consortium agreements. The Financial Creditor&#039;s unilateral actions, including classifying the account as an NPA and discontinuing credit facilities, were found to breach the contract terms. The petition was dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition following legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 10:17:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1827 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287301</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Financial Creditor&#039;s petition under Section 7 of the IBC due to non-compliance with the Third Supplemental Inter Se Agreement. The Financial Creditor&#039;s failure to provide the mandatory notice to the Lead Bank rendered the petition not maintainable. The tribunal highlighted the importance of honoring contractual obligations and acting in accordance with consortium agreements. The Financial Creditor&#039;s unilateral actions, including classifying the account as an NPA and discontinuing credit facilities, were found to breach the contract terms. The petition was dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition following legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>