<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 188 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for non-disclosure of receipts and an unsecured loan. The appeal was found non-maintainable as the tax effect fell below the threshold limit specified in CBDT Circular No.17/2019, following principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal granted liberty to identify cases where the tax effect exceeded the limit for possible recall of appeal dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:35:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 188 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for non-disclosure of receipts and an unsecured loan. The appeal was found non-maintainable as the tax effect fell below the threshold limit specified in CBDT Circular No.17/2019, following principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal granted liberty to identify cases where the tax effect exceeded the limit for possible recall of appeal dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>