<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 559 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287293</link>
    <description>A Managing Director is covered as an &quot;employee&quot; under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act, 1948 only where the company establishes a contract of employment and the requisite employer-employee relationship. The court noted that a Managing Director may, in some cases, hold a dual capacity as both agent and employee, but that depends on the appointment terms, articles of association, or a separate employment contract. In the absence of such material, a mere reference in an inspection report was insufficient. On the facts found, the remuneration paid to the Managing Director was not wages within the statutory definition and was not liable to ESI contribution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 559 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287293</link>
      <description>A Managing Director is covered as an &quot;employee&quot; under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act, 1948 only where the company establishes a contract of employment and the requisite employer-employee relationship. The court noted that a Managing Director may, in some cases, hold a dual capacity as both agent and employee, but that depends on the appointment terms, articles of association, or a separate employment contract. In the absence of such material, a mere reference in an inspection report was insufficient. On the facts found, the remuneration paid to the Managing Director was not wages within the statutory definition and was not liable to ESI contribution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>