<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 184 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to lack of substantial evidence linking them to the smuggled goods. The dismissal of the appeals by the Commissioner (Appeals) as time-barred was also overturned, allowing the appeals to be decided on their merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 184 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to lack of substantial evidence linking them to the smuggled goods. The dismissal of the appeals by the Commissioner (Appeals) as time-barred was also overturned, allowing the appeals to be decided on their merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>