<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (5) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287286</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and restored the orders of the Sessions Judge, partially allowing the respondents&#039; appeals by adjusting the percentage of broken rice and foreign matter. The Court emphasized the importance of strict compliance with permit conditions and the correct application of legal standards for classification and burden of proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:12:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (5) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287286</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, and restored the orders of the Sessions Judge, partially allowing the respondents&#039; appeals by adjusting the percentage of broken rice and foreign matter. The Court emphasized the importance of strict compliance with permit conditions and the correct application of legal standards for classification and burden of proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>