<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21948</link>
    <description>An application for interest on surtax refund had to be dealt with by the authority: if an order had already been passed, it was to be communicated to the petitioner, and if not, the application was to be decided according to law within the stipulated time. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with directions focused on prompt communication or adjudication of the refund-interest request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21948</link>
      <description>An application for interest on surtax refund had to be dealt with by the authority: if an order had already been passed, it was to be communicated to the petitioner, and if not, the application was to be decided according to law within the stipulated time. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with directions focused on prompt communication or adjudication of the refund-interest request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>