<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1471 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287273</link>
    <description>Documentary evidence showing PAN, confirmations, bank statements, audited accounts and repayment details established the lender&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness, so the loan was not treated as unexplained and the related interest disallowance failed. A redevelopment agreement did not amount to a transfer of tenancy rights where the tenant retained possession until alternate accommodation was provided; in the absence of a transfer under section 2(47), section 50C could not be invoked and the capital gains addition was deleted. House property income estimated by the lower authorities was sustained because no material displaced the factual basis of that estimate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 09:56:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1471 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287273</link>
      <description>Documentary evidence showing PAN, confirmations, bank statements, audited accounts and repayment details established the lender&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness, so the loan was not treated as unexplained and the related interest disallowance failed. A redevelopment agreement did not amount to a transfer of tenancy rights where the tenant retained possession until alternate accommodation was provided; in the absence of a transfer under section 2(47), section 50C could not be invoked and the capital gains addition was deleted. House property income estimated by the lower authorities was sustained because no material displaced the factual basis of that estimate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>