<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1888 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287281</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that the benefits under the 2011 Industrial Policy of Bihar should continue for the full five years from the date of commercial production, despite the policy&#039;s expiration. The court applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, preventing the State from retracting promised benefits. A mandamus was issued to the State to provide the petitioner with the specified exemptions as per the policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 09:56:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1888 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287281</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that the benefits under the 2011 Industrial Policy of Bihar should continue for the full five years from the date of commercial production, despite the policy&#039;s expiration. The court applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, preventing the State from retracting promised benefits. A mandamus was issued to the State to provide the petitioner with the specified exemptions as per the policy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>