https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287265 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant-mother, granting her custody of the minor child. The court prioritized the child's welfare, considering factors such as the father's criminal conduct and the mother's ability to provide care. Emphasizing the jurisdiction of the English court due to the family's ties to England, the court rejected jurisdiction based on the child's current location. The decision underscored the importance of the child's best interests and the mother's suitability for providing a nurturing environment. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 18:32:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287265 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant-mother, granting her custody of the minor child. The court prioritized the child's welfare, considering factors such as the father's criminal conduct and the mother's ability to provide care. Emphasizing the jurisdiction of the English court due to the family's ties to England, the court rejected jurisdiction based on the child's current location. The decision underscored the importance of the child's best interests and the mother's suitability for providing a nurturing environment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287265