<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1200 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287261</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Company Law Board&#039;s order and directed the rectification of the share register in favor of Dev Raj and Lalitya Kumari based on the succession certificate and Will. The respondent group&#039;s appeals were dismissed for lack of supporting documents, and costs were awarded to the petitioners. The court emphasized the petitioners&#039; right to rectification and dismissed challenges by the respondents due to lack of legal standing and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1200 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287261</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Company Law Board&#039;s order and directed the rectification of the share register in favor of Dev Raj and Lalitya Kumari based on the succession certificate and Will. The respondent group&#039;s appeals were dismissed for lack of supporting documents, and costs were awarded to the petitioners. The court emphasized the petitioners&#039; right to rectification and dismissed challenges by the respondents due to lack of legal standing and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>