https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287260 The Court found the Municipal Commissioner's actions in cancelling the panel of empanelled lawyers representing the Corporation and appointing another lawyer without approval to be arbitrary and unjust. The Court emphasized the importance of Article 14 in discretionary appointments and the Commissioner's duty to serve the Corporators. The Court quashed the cancellation of the panel and the appointment of the new lawyer, reaffirming democratic principles in local self-government. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:45:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287260 The Court found the Municipal Commissioner's actions in cancelling the panel of empanelled lawyers representing the Corporation and appointing another lawyer without approval to be arbitrary and unjust. The Court emphasized the importance of Article 14 in discretionary appointments and the Commissioner's duty to serve the Corporators. The Court quashed the cancellation of the panel and the appointment of the new lawyer, reaffirming democratic principles in local self-government. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287260