<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394263</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay adjourned the case for two weeks after the respondents failed to appear. The petition contested the rejection of a refund claim according to specific rules. The court scheduled the next hearing for 29th August 2019, expecting the Revenue to be present.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394263</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay adjourned the case for two weeks after the respondents failed to appear. The petition contested the rejection of a refund claim according to specific rules. The court scheduled the next hearing for 29th August 2019, expecting the Revenue to be present.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>