<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394263</link>
    <description>Petition challenging rejection of a refund claim was adjourned for two weeks, with the petitioner directed to file an affidavit of service by 21 August 2019 and serve the respondents with a copy of the order. The matter was listed for 29 August 2019, and if the Revenue remained unrepresented on that date, it was to be considered on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 170 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394263</link>
      <description>Petition challenging rejection of a refund claim was adjourned for two weeks, with the petitioner directed to file an affidavit of service by 21 August 2019 and serve the respondents with a copy of the order. The matter was listed for 29 August 2019, and if the Revenue remained unrepresented on that date, it was to be considered on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>