https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394250 The court directed respondent nos. 2 and 3 to process refund applications within four weeks, including reassessing bills of entry if required, following inaction on orders dated 29th October, 2009 by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) under the Customs Act, 1962. The petition was disposed of with this directive, addressing the failure to act on the petitioner's refund entitlement and emphasizing the need for timely administrative action to uphold justice and efficiency. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:41:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394250 The court directed respondent nos. 2 and 3 to process refund applications within four weeks, including reassessing bills of entry if required, following inaction on orders dated 29th October, 2009 by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) under the Customs Act, 1962. The petition was disposed of with this directive, addressing the failure to act on the petitioner's refund entitlement and emphasizing the need for timely administrative action to uphold justice and efficiency. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394250