https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394248 Deemed service of a section 8 demand notice was treated as sufficient where the notice was sent to the registered office and the director's residential address, the corporate debtor did not specifically deny receipt, and the postal record and reply supported service. On that basis, the section 9 proceeding could be maintained. The application was also held to be within limitation because the invoices were raised in March 2017, the last part-payment was made on 20 June 2017, and the application was filed on 15 September 2018, within the three-year period. The rejection of the insolvency application was therefore set aside and admission of the application was directed. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:20:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394248 Deemed service of a section 8 demand notice was treated as sufficient where the notice was sent to the registered office and the director's residential address, the corporate debtor did not specifically deny receipt, and the postal record and reply supported service. On that basis, the section 9 proceeding could be maintained. The application was also held to be within limitation because the invoices were raised in March 2017, the last part-payment was made on 20 June 2017, and the application was filed on 15 September 2018, within the three-year period. The rejection of the insolvency application was therefore set aside and admission of the application was directed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394248