https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394248 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant proved proper delivery of the demand notice, with no explicit denial by the Corporate Debtor. While a dispute was raised in response to the notice, evidence of a pre-existing dispute was lacking. The application was timely filed within the statutory limitation period. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, instructing the Adjudicating Authority to admit the application, with a scheduled appearance date for the parties. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:20:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394248 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant proved proper delivery of the demand notice, with no explicit denial by the Corporate Debtor. While a dispute was raised in response to the notice, evidence of a pre-existing dispute was lacking. The application was timely filed within the statutory limitation period. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, instructing the Adjudicating Authority to admit the application, with a scheduled appearance date for the parties. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394248