<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 95 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21937</link>
    <description>Profit arising from the sale of agricultural land situated within municipal limits was held exigible to capital gains tax because binding Division Bench rulings of the same High Court had already treated such transfer as taxable. The contrary view relied on by the assessee was not accepted, and the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was found inconsistent with those precedents. The referred question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 95 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21937</link>
      <description>Profit arising from the sale of agricultural land situated within municipal limits was held exigible to capital gains tax because binding Division Bench rulings of the same High Court had already treated such transfer as taxable. The contrary view relied on by the assessee was not accepted, and the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was found inconsistent with those precedents. The referred question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>