<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21936</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that dumpers and tippers are eligible for investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that machinery used in the business of construction is generally eligible for investment allowance, including essential equipment like dumpers and tippers. This decision favored the assessee, affirming that these vehicles are crucial for construction work and do not fall within the exclusion of road transport vehicles under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21936</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that dumpers and tippers are eligible for investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that machinery used in the business of construction is generally eligible for investment allowance, including essential equipment like dumpers and tippers. This decision favored the assessee, affirming that these vehicles are crucial for construction work and do not fall within the exclusion of road transport vehicles under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>