<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394232</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revision against the tax demand, emphasizing that the assessment was based on undisclosed transactions observed during the survey, not just the absence of account books. The Court found no violation of natural justice in not providing the SIB report to the revisionist and distinguished the precedents cited by the revisionist based on the specific facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394232</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revision against the tax demand, emphasizing that the assessment was based on undisclosed transactions observed during the survey, not just the absence of account books. The Court found no violation of natural justice in not providing the SIB report to the revisionist and distinguished the precedents cited by the revisionist based on the specific facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>