https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394227 The High Court upheld the challenge against a recovery notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs. The petitioner, who had not paid the predeposit amount leading to a rejected appeal, sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal before CESTAT. The petitioner, having already remitted an amount exceeding the pre-deposit requirement, was directed to deposit an additional sum within a specified timeframe to lift the attachment on bank accounts pending the appeal outcome. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:28:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394227 The High Court upheld the challenge against a recovery notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs. The petitioner, who had not paid the predeposit amount leading to a rejected appeal, sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal before CESTAT. The petitioner, having already remitted an amount exceeding the pre-deposit requirement, was directed to deposit an additional sum within a specified timeframe to lift the attachment on bank accounts pending the appeal outcome. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394227