https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287250 The court granted leave to defend to the defendants, imposing a condition to deposit Rs. 2,77,26,742 within six weeks. It held that the invoices formed valid contracts, emphasizing procedural compliance under Order 37 CPC. The court also addressed the issue of an advocate acting in a dual capacity and the alleged exclusive distributorship agreement, finding in favor of the plaintiff. The applications for leave to defend and condonation of delay were disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:27:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287250 The court granted leave to defend to the defendants, imposing a condition to deposit Rs. 2,77,26,742 within six weeks. It held that the invoices formed valid contracts, emphasizing procedural compliance under Order 37 CPC. The court also addressed the issue of an advocate acting in a dual capacity and the alleged exclusive distributorship agreement, finding in favor of the plaintiff. The applications for leave to defend and condonation of delay were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287250