<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287249</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a tax case, ruling that the sale of shares was correctly treated as &#039;Business Income&#039; rather than Short Term Capital Gains due to trading intent. Interest income was deemed &#039;Income from Other Sources,&#039; and various expenses were disallowed. An addition for low withdrawals was upheld, and a special audit under Section 142(2A) was deemed necessary. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, affirming all decisions made by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:27:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287249</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a tax case, ruling that the sale of shares was correctly treated as &#039;Business Income&#039; rather than Short Term Capital Gains due to trading intent. Interest income was deemed &#039;Income from Other Sources,&#039; and various expenses were disallowed. An addition for low withdrawals was upheld, and a special audit under Section 142(2A) was deemed necessary. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, affirming all decisions made by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>