<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 93 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21933</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to directly answer the question of whether income-tax refunds should be considered as assets for net wealth valuation on the valuation date. Instead, the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for further consideration based on guidelines provided in the judgment, considering the circumstances under which the refund arises. The decision was made unanimously by the judges, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 93 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21933</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to directly answer the question of whether income-tax refunds should be considered as assets for net wealth valuation on the valuation date. Instead, the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for further consideration based on guidelines provided in the judgment, considering the circumstances under which the refund arises. The decision was made unanimously by the judges, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>