<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1465 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance under Section 68 and the commission expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and proper inquiry, rejecting decisions based on mere suspicion or non-appearance of individuals. The judgment underscores the necessity for the AO to conduct thorough investigations and rely on concrete evidence before making additions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:25:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1465 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance under Section 68 and the commission expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and proper inquiry, rejecting decisions based on mere suspicion or non-appearance of individuals. The judgment underscores the necessity for the AO to conduct thorough investigations and rely on concrete evidence before making additions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>