https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287239 The Tribunal's findings on the firing period and taxable turnover were based on evidence of belated closure intimation, survey stock of coal, and the absence of proper accounts, leading to the inference that firing continued beyond the period disclosed by the dealer. In revision, such concurrent findings of fact are not ordinarily disturbed unless they are perverse or unsupported by evidence. The court therefore held that the findings were factual and did not justify interference in revision. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 09:48:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287239 The Tribunal's findings on the firing period and taxable turnover were based on evidence of belated closure intimation, survey stock of coal, and the absence of proper accounts, leading to the inference that firing continued beyond the period disclosed by the dealer. In revision, such concurrent findings of fact are not ordinarily disturbed unless they are perverse or unsupported by evidence. The court therefore held that the findings were factual and did not justify interference in revision. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287239