<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 999 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287239</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revision filed against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 1978-79. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss appeals by the applicant and the Commissioner of Sales Tax was upheld. The discrepancy in the disclosed turnover was addressed through subsequent appeals, resulting in a reduction but still leaving a variance. The increase in the firing period was contested, with adverse findings based on surveys conducted. The delayed intimation of the closing of the firing period and issues related to maintenance of accounts were also considered, leading to the dismissal of the revision for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 09:48:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 999 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287239</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revision filed against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 1978-79. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss appeals by the applicant and the Commissioner of Sales Tax was upheld. The discrepancy in the disclosed turnover was addressed through subsequent appeals, resulting in a reduction but still leaving a variance. The increase in the firing period was contested, with adverse findings based on surveys conducted. The delayed intimation of the closing of the firing period and issues related to maintenance of accounts were also considered, leading to the dismissal of the revision for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>