<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394198</link>
    <description>The judgment in the case addressed various issues including the authority of officers under the Finance Act, 1994 to alter taxing entries, recovery of tax liabilities for 2007-2014, applicability of abatement on material costs in service contracts, discrepancy in tax assessments between service and works contracts, compliance with VAT liability examination, and interpretation of composition scheme for service tax payment. The court emphasized the finality of judicial decisions on the taxability of works contract services, limited the authority to levy tax to the service component, and directed compliance with taxation frameworks for works contract services, ultimately disposing of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394198</link>
      <description>The judgment in the case addressed various issues including the authority of officers under the Finance Act, 1994 to alter taxing entries, recovery of tax liabilities for 2007-2014, applicability of abatement on material costs in service contracts, discrepancy in tax assessments between service and works contracts, compliance with VAT liability examination, and interpretation of composition scheme for service tax payment. The court emphasized the finality of judicial decisions on the taxability of works contract services, limited the authority to levy tax to the service component, and directed compliance with taxation frameworks for works contract services, ultimately disposing of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>