<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 104 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394197</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed the tax liability on legal services provided by overseas entities to M/s Ghodawat Energy Private Limited, based on the Finance Act, 1994 provisions. The appeals challenged recovery orders and penalties under sections 76 and 78. The tax liability was linked to legal services by M/s Eversheds LLP, Singapore, for representation in the International Court of Arbitration. Legal arguments focused on taxable services definitions and exemptions. The judgment discussed tax on services outside India, arbitration proceedings, liability discharge on rental property, and penalties imposition. The matter was remanded for quantification of recoverable amounts based on invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2020 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 104 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394197</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed the tax liability on legal services provided by overseas entities to M/s Ghodawat Energy Private Limited, based on the Finance Act, 1994 provisions. The appeals challenged recovery orders and penalties under sections 76 and 78. The tax liability was linked to legal services by M/s Eversheds LLP, Singapore, for representation in the International Court of Arbitration. Legal arguments focused on taxable services definitions and exemptions. The judgment discussed tax on services outside India, arbitration proceedings, liability discharge on rental property, and penalties imposition. The matter was remanded for quantification of recoverable amounts based on invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>