<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394194</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming a demand of service tax against the appellant, amounting to Rs. 36,17,013/-, along with interest and penalties. The case involved the appellant disputing the demand under reverse charge mechanism for Legal Consultancy Services and Security Services. The Tribunal found lack of document verification by the Adjudicating Authority and audit team, leading to negligence in confirming the demand. The matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for proper correlation of service tax payments and verification, allowing the appellant to provide relevant documents for reconsideration of the liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2020 09:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394194</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming a demand of service tax against the appellant, amounting to Rs. 36,17,013/-, along with interest and penalties. The case involved the appellant disputing the demand under reverse charge mechanism for Legal Consultancy Services and Security Services. The Tribunal found lack of document verification by the Adjudicating Authority and audit team, leading to negligence in confirming the demand. The matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for proper correlation of service tax payments and verification, allowing the appellant to provide relevant documents for reconsideration of the liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>