https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287208 An appellate order that judicially determines abatement and refuses revival is treated as a final appellate order for limitation purposes, because it finally disposes of the appeal and gives a fresh starting point for execution under Article 182(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908. The executing court also has discretion to allow amendment of a defective execution application under Order XXI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and that discretion will not be disturbed absent error. On these principles, the execution proceedings were held to be within time and the amendment was upheld. en-us Mon, 19 Dec 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Apr 2020 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287208 An appellate order that judicially determines abatement and refuses revival is treated as a final appellate order for limitation purposes, because it finally disposes of the appeal and gives a fresh starting point for execution under Article 182(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908. The executing court also has discretion to allow amendment of a defective execution application under Order XXI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and that discretion will not be disturbed absent error. On these principles, the execution proceedings were held to be within time and the amendment was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Dec 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287208