<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 98 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394191</link>
    <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned by the tribunal due to bonafide reasons, allowing the appeal for adjudication. Regarding the disallowance under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, the tribunal found that the reimbursement for property tax was contractual and not a statutory liability, thus deleting the disallowance and partly allowing the appeal. The judgment emphasizes the significance of contractual obligations in determining the allowability of expenses under tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 98 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394191</link>
      <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned by the tribunal due to bonafide reasons, allowing the appeal for adjudication. Regarding the disallowance under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, the tribunal found that the reimbursement for property tax was contractual and not a statutory liability, thus deleting the disallowance and partly allowing the appeal. The judgment emphasizes the significance of contractual obligations in determining the allowability of expenses under tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>