<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 96 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394189</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC as the product manufactured by the assessee was a prohibited item. Additionally, the tribunal supported the disallowance of business expenses due to lack of evidence to substantiate the transactions, in accordance with section 37(1) of the Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:07:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 96 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394189</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC as the product manufactured by the assessee was a prohibited item. Additionally, the tribunal supported the disallowance of business expenses due to lack of evidence to substantiate the transactions, in accordance with section 37(1) of the Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>