<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 94 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the deletion of the disallowance made under Section 36(1)(iii) for interest payment on interest-free advances, as the assessee had sufficient own funds. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the AO to re-compute the disallowance under Section 14A, restricting it to dividend-yielding investments only to determine the average value of investments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 94 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the deletion of the disallowance made under Section 36(1)(iii) for interest payment on interest-free advances, as the assessee had sufficient own funds. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the AO to re-compute the disallowance under Section 14A, restricting it to dividend-yielding investments only to determine the average value of investments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>