<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 90 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394183</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the Directors providing the share application money. It emphasized the importance of the Assessing Officer conducting an independent inquiry before making such additions, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 90 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394183</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the Directors providing the share application money. It emphasized the importance of the Assessing Officer conducting an independent inquiry before making such additions, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>