<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 87 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the appellant, directing the AO to delete the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) and Section 271AAB. The penalties were deemed unjustified as the additional income was voluntarily disclosed without any incriminating evidence found during the search, aligning with precedents that penalties necessitate clear grounds and evidence of undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 87 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the appellant, directing the AO to delete the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) and Section 271AAB. The penalties were deemed unjustified as the additional income was voluntarily disclosed without any incriminating evidence found during the search, aligning with precedents that penalties necessitate clear grounds and evidence of undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>