<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 82 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394175</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the confiscation of red sanders and cash, as the department failed to establish that the goods were intended for export. The penalty imposed on the appellant was also set aside. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, particularly the right to cross-examine witnesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 11:40:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 82 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394175</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the confiscation of red sanders and cash, as the department failed to establish that the goods were intended for export. The penalty imposed on the appellant was also set aside. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, particularly the right to cross-examine witnesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>