<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 69 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394162</link>
    <description>An appellate order sustaining an assessment was set aside because the Tribunal did not examine the material issues raised, including the basis for extrapolating escaped turnover and the alleged mismatch in the survey reference. The omission was treated as going to the root of the matter, since the controversy had not been considered with adequate care on the record. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication of the issues raised by both sides on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 11:03:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 69 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394162</link>
      <description>An appellate order sustaining an assessment was set aside because the Tribunal did not examine the material issues raised, including the basis for extrapolating escaped turnover and the alleged mismatch in the survey reference. The omission was treated as going to the root of the matter, since the controversy had not been considered with adequate care on the record. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication of the issues raised by both sides on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>